In less than a month, the Supreme Court is expected to offer their opinion on King v. Burwell as to whether or not specific words written in legislation passed by Congress actually mean what they say. Does "established by the state" actually mean established by the state? Are we ready for the storm?
While I'm still unable to find anything in the Constitution that allows the federal government to get involved in healthcare, let alone to force you to purchase something, the Supreme Court has justified its existence by calling it a tax. In June, however, the Supreme Court will offer their opinion, once again, in a case (King vs Burwell) that has the potential to severely weaken Obamacare.